Ayoon Wa Azan (No Friend or Ally is Left)
Jihad el-Khazen Al-Hayat - 20/07/06//
The US Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, who is also the 'Ambassador of Israel', according to Israeli Ambassador Dan Gillerman, does not want the Israeli raids on Lebanese civilians to end, because Israel is 'defending itself' by killing hundreds of innocent people and destroying Lebanon's infrastructure. This is literally Israel's position, as expressed by its ambassador to the UN.
The evil Israeli cabal in the US administration and its entourage are almost as active as the Israeli air force (and the US-made war planes). It lies and defends 'Israeli Nazism' with an enthusiasm that can only mean Israel intends to continue to fight and kill.
In this column I can only give examples of other evil people, beginning with William Kristol, the editor of 'The Weekly Standard', the mouthpiece of the neo-conservatives. He combines the views of Israel and its apologists in an article entitled: 'It's Our War'. In short, he says in this article that this war is different from all the previous Arab-Israeli wars, because the Arab states do not support Hamas and Hezbollah, and that Israel is actually fighting a war with Iran through its agents. It is therefore an Islamist-Israeli war; you might even say it is an Islamist war on the West.
Kristol, a son of Irving, hails from a family steeped in extremism and hatred of the Arabs and Muslims. He says that Syria and Iran are the enemies of both Israel and the US. I will respond by saying that Israel is the greatest enemy of the US, and it harms US interests in the Middle East and the world. Israel did not leave the US with a friend or an ally; instead, it gave the US some fleeting benefits. People like Kristol sacrifice the US, its interests and its youth for the sake of Israel's defense.
William Kristol suggested that President Bush fly from the G8 Summit in Russia to Jerusalem, "the capital of a nation that stands with us, and is willing to fight with us, against our common enemies. This is our war, too". It is a Nazi-like Israeli war against the Palestinians and the Lebanese, and against all the Arabs and Muslims, a war instigated by the evil US gang that has pledged allegiance to Israel.
Robert Satloff, the Executive Director of the pro-Israeli Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) wrote an article headlined: 'The Rogues Strike Back'. Likewise, he believes that the defeat of Israel will mean the defeat of the US. He tries to prove that there is an alliance between Iran, Syria, Hamas and Hezbollah by tracing the progression of events.
He quoted Khaled Mashaal as saying in Damascus that the Israeli soldier is a "prisoner of war", he also cited Ali Larijani's declaration that Iran will not give a formal reply to the US-EU offer of incentives until late August. Afterward, Hezbollah attacked Israel and hit northern Israel with missiles the next day. If Satloff continues to enumerate the events up to the present, he will find a new incident to add to his list every day, but he will not include the Israel's Nazi-like crimes that include collective punishment and the killing of innocent civilians.
Thanks to the evil Israeli gang in Washington, the US has created a monster that kills and destroys with US-made weapons under the aegis of American policy.
Satloff claims that he is knowledgeable, but he has erred in stating the most basic information. He claims that Hezbollah has 25 deputies in parliament, while it has only 11 deputies in the Lebanese Resistance's al-Wafaa bloc. Satloff's reference to the overall number of Shiite deputies as being 25 is incorrect because the total number of Hezbollah deputies is 14, and the number of deputies of Lebanon Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri's Amal Movement is only 16. Together they make up a total of 30 Shiite parliamentarians, not 25.
The 'Weekly Standard' reflects the evil thoughts of the Israeli gang every day and every week. The WINEP was founded with the aim of supporting Israel. We also have the American Enterprise Institute, the most prominent bastion of the neo-conservatives.
The day the fighting between Hezbollah and Israel erupted I was reading a study. Although it was dated July 12, it seems that it was written before the recent incidents. It was written by Michael Rubin and Suzanne Gershowitz for the American Enterprise Institute, and it reflects the opinion of the Israeli gang on the ways to combat terrorism.
Entitled "Political Strategies to Counterterrorism", the study begins with a phrase that no writer has ever thought of before. It reads: "Terrorism is a growing threat". It went on to say: "As the terror threat grows and groups like al-Qaeda and Hezbollah demonstrate worldwide reach…" - and here I stop to draw the reader's attention to this venomous and false phrase.
The two writers, who are Jewish-American-Israeli to the core, put both Hezbollah and al-Qaeda in the same basket, even though Hezbollah is a national liberation movement fighting Israeli terrorism. By contrast, al-Qaeda is a terrorist organization that the whole world must join forces to eradicate. The US was left to lead the war on al-Qaeda because it possesses the greatest capabilities. But the writers lied when they attributed 'worldwide reach' to al-Qaeda and Hezbollah. Al-Qaeda spreads terrorism around the world, but Hezbollah and Hamas always restrict their operations to the confrontation with Israel.
The authors suggest a simple definition of terrorism: "The deliberate targeting of civilians for political gain". This definition is acceptable, and it resembles another one I have heard in the UN: "The targeting of non-combatant civilians".
The five-page article, however, sometimes talks about al-Qaeda, and, at others, Hezbollah. It refers to the Palestinians without stating that, according to the definition of terrorism, Israel be condemned more than any other country or organization in the Middle East.
Israel killed five times as many Palestinian civilians as the number of Israelis killed by all the Palestinian factions. It is now killing Lebanese civilians, and exercises a Nazi-like collective punishment. One point should be borne in mind: Hamas kidnapped a soldier and Hezbollah abducted two others; Israel responded to purely military operations by killing civilians.
The Middle East will not see the light of day as long as this cancer called Israel continues to dangerously spread, and as long as the cancer-like intellect that justifies its actions directs American policy against the peoples of the region, Islam, and Muslims - and against the interests of the US as well.
|
